Skip to Content
Curtis Law Firm Curtis Law Firm
Hablamos Español (720) 408-7726
Top

What To Know About Relocating With Children in Colorado

Compassionate Guidance & Aggressive Representation
|

A job offer lands in your inbox. A family member needs you closer. A new relationship has you weighing a move across the state. Whatever the reason, the moment you start thinking about relocating with your children in Colorado, the legal questions follow fast. Can you go? Do you need permission? What happens if your co-parent says no? These aren’t hypothetical concerns. They’re questions we’ve been helping Denver-metro families work through for over 15 years.

If you’re on the other side (the parent who just found out your co-parent wants to move with your kids), the anxiety is just as real. You may be wondering whether you can stop it, or whether your parenting time is about to shrink permanently. Neither panic nor false confidence serves you well here. What does serve you is understanding what Colorado law actually says, not the oversimplified versions circulating online.

Colorado’s relocation framework has real nuance. The statute doesn’t work the way many people assume, and the courts are actively refining the rules. Here’s what you need to know.

What Legally Counts as Relocation in Colorado

Not every move triggers the formal relocation process under Colorado law. C.R.S. 14-10-129(1)(a)(II) governs moves that would substantially change the geographical ties between the child and the other parent. That language matters because there’s no fixed mileage threshold in the statute. A move 45 minutes away could require court approval if it disrupts an established parenting time schedule, while a longer move might not if the existing schedule can still be honored without disruption. Courts apply a fact-specific analysis to each family’s situation. What matters is the practical impact on the child’s relationship with the non-relocating parent, not a GPS measurement between ZIP codes.

One threshold question often catches parents off guard. If you’re in the middle of a divorce or legal separation and the petition has already been filed and served, an automatic temporary injunction under C.R.S. 14-10-107(4)(b)(I)(C) is already in place. That injunction bars either parent from removing the children from Colorado without the other parent’s written consent or a court order. It attaches automatically to the case. No one has to request it. Moving before obtaining that consent or order can have serious legal consequences from the start.

The Notice Requirement Under C.R.S. 14-10-129

If a parenting time order is already in place and you want to relocate with your children, the first step is written notice to the other parent. The statute requires that notice be given “as soon as practicable” before the intended move. That standard doesn’t carry a fixed number of days. Some articles online state a flat “60 days advance notice” requirement, but that language doesn’t appear in C.R.S. 14-10-129. Courts interpret “as soon as practicable” based on when the relocating parent reasonably knew the move was happening, which means earlier is always safer.

The written notice must include three specific things:

  • The intended new location where you plan to relocate
  • The reason for the move, explained plainly
  • A proposed revised parenting time plan that accounts for the new geography

You may also encounter references online to a 21-day response window and a 35-day hearing deadline. Those timeframes are real, but they apply to a specific and narrow part of the statute governing objections tied to a parent’s criminal conviction or documented domestic violence history. They don’t govern the standard relocation notice and objection process. Conflating the two can lead a parent to believe they have less time than they do, or more time than is prudent.

How Colorado Courts Decide Relocation Cases

Once the other parent objects and the matter goes before a judge, the court applies the best interests of the child standard drawn from C.R.S. 14-10-124(1.5). Judges look at a range of factors: the child’s adjustment to their current home, school, and community; each parent’s relationship with the child; the child’s own preferences when they’re old enough to express them meaningfully; and the ability of each parent to support the child’s relationship with the other after the move.

The landmark Colorado Supreme Court decision in In re Marriage of Ciesluk settled one foundational question: neither parent carries an automatic presumption for or against relocation. The parent wanting to move isn’t entitled to go just because the reason sounds legitimate. The parent wanting to stay isn’t entitled to block the move just because they object. Every case gets analyzed on its own facts.

It’s worth understanding the distinction between cases decided before a final custody order exists and cases where a post-decree relocation motion is filed after orders are already in place. The initial custody determination during a divorce uses the standard articulated in Spahmer v. Gullette, focusing on the child’s best interests without an established parenting plan to modify. A post-decree relocation motion under C.R.S. 14-10-129 has a different procedural posture because a prior order already exists. Several online resources blur this line, applying initial-custody reasoning to a post-decree motion as if they were the same process.

Colorado family law isn’t static. The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage of Dale (2026 CO 35) resolved an important question about how courts should classify a parenting-time reduction: whether such a reduction is a modification of parenting time, which carries one legal standard, or a restriction, which carries a stricter standard because it implies harm to the child. The court held that a purely quantitative reduction can’t amount to a restriction unless it eliminates parenting time altogether or imposes qualitative constraints on how a parent exercises it. That clarification matters for how Denver courts analyze motions that would substantially reduce a parent’s parenting time going forward.

Filing a Relocation Case in the Denver Metro Area

Knowing the law is one thing; knowing where to file and what forms to use is another. In Denver, family law matters including divorce, child custody, and parenting time modification are filed in Colorado’s Second Judicial District at Denver District Court, located at the Denver City and County Building. Denver Juvenile Court is a separate court within the same district and handles certain custody and parenting time matters; it’s located at the Lindsey Flanigan Building.

The form you’ll use is JDF 1407 (Motion/Stipulation to Relocate Minor Children). If both parents agree, check the stipulation box at the top and complete it together. If the other parent objects, check the motion box and file unilaterally, with the court adjudicating the dispute. Either way, an existing parenting time order must already be in place before the relocation process under C.R.S. 14-10-129 applies.

For parents handling the process on their own, Denver District Court’s Self-Help Center runs a free virtual Family Law Ask-a-Lawyer clinic on the first Thursday of each month. Staff there can point you to forms and resources, but they can’t give legal advice on your specific situation.

Protecting Your Parental Rights Through the Process

The single most common mistake in relocation cases is moving first and asking permission later. If a parenting time order is in place and you relocate a child without providing the required notice or obtaining court approval, you’re exposing yourself to civil contempt, a reduction or loss of your own parenting time, and potentially a custodial interference claim. Courts take unauthorized relocations seriously, and a judge who might have approved a move under ordinary circumstances can view a parent who acted unilaterally very differently.

Relocation cases do receive docket priority under C.R.S. 14-10-129(1)(a)(II), which means the court is supposed to move them along faster than routine matters. But “priority” on a busy Denver family court docket still means planning for several weeks before a resolution. Parents who treat this as an emergency they can resolve in a few days often create bigger problems by acting before the process completes.

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), adopted by Colorado and most other states, also comes into play when a proposed move crosses state lines. If the children have lived in Colorado long enough to establish it as their home state, Colorado retains jurisdiction over custody matters even after a move is approved. That baseline matters for any parent considering an out-of-state relocation.

Relocation outcomes turn heavily on how the process is handled from the very first notice forward. The documentation you provide, the proposed parenting plan you offer, and the timing of every step all shape how a court perceives your intentions and your case. Whether you’re the parent hoping to move or the parent working to protect your time, Curtis Law Firm provides personalized, fully bilingual family law representation to families across the Denver metro area, including Jefferson, Douglas, Arapahoe, and Adams County. Call us at (720) 408-7726 to talk through your situation.